1. Why Run LLMs Locally?
Cloud APIs are powerful but expensive. If you use OpenClaw, Claude, or GPT-4 heavily, your monthly bill can easily hit $50โ200+. Every heartbeat check, cron job, code completion, and research task burns tokens at Anthropic or OpenAI rates.
Running local models via Ollama on Apple Silicon lets you offload many of these tasks to hardware you own โ with zero marginal cost per token, complete privacy, and no rate limits.
Apple Silicon is uniquely suited for this because of its unified memory architecture โ the CPU and GPU share the same memory pool. This means a Mac Mini with 24GB of unified memory can use all 24GB for model weights, unlike a PC where your GPU's VRAM is separate from system RAM.
2. Why Memory Matters for LLMs
Unified Memory = Your Entire Pool Is Available
On a traditional PC, your RTX 4090 has 24GB of VRAM. If a model doesn't fit, it spills to system RAM over the PCIe bus โ and performance collapses 10โ20ร. On Apple Silicon, there's no bus to cross. The GPU cores read directly from the same memory pool as the CPU.
Memory Bandwidth = Tokens Per Second
LLM inference during text generation is memory-bandwidth bound, not compute-bound. Every token generated requires reading the entire model's weights from memory. The formula is simple:
How Much Memory Do Models Need?
A rough rule of thumb for 4-bit quantized (Q4) models:
- ~0.5 GB per billion parameters for Q4_K_M quantization
- 7B model โ ~4 GB
- 13B model โ ~7.5 GB
- 33B model โ ~19 GB
- 70B model โ ~40 GB
- You also need 2โ4 GB for the OS and KV cache overhead
Memory Bandwidth Comparison
| Chip | Bandwidth | vs RTX 4090 (1,008 GB/s) |
|---|---|---|
| M4 | 120 GB/s | 12% |
| M4 Pro | 273 GB/s | 27% |
| M4 Max (32-core GPU) | 410 GB/s | 41% |
| M4 Max (40-core GPU) | 546 GB/s | 54% |
| M3 Ultra | 819 GB/s | 81% |
While Apple Silicon can't match an RTX 4090's raw bandwidth, remember: the 4090 only has 24GB of VRAM. A Mac Studio with 128GB can run models the 4090 simply cannot fit.
3. The Mac Mini M4 Lineup (2024)
The Mac Mini was redesigned in late 2024 โ it's now roughly the size of an Apple TV, starting at just $499. Here's every configuration relevant for local AI:
| Configuration | CPU / GPU | Memory | Bandwidth | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Mini M4 (base) | 10C CPU / 10C GPU | 16GB | 120 GB/s | $499 |
| Mac Mini M4 (upgraded RAM) | 10C CPU / 10C GPU | 24GB | 120 GB/s | $699 |
| Mac Mini M4 (max RAM) | 10C CPU / 10C GPU | 32GB | 120 GB/s | $899 |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro (base) | 12C CPU / 16C GPU | 24GB | 273 GB/s | $1,399 |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro (48GB) | 14C CPU / 20C GPU | 48GB | 273 GB/s | ~$2,199 |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro (64GB) | 14C CPU / 20C GPU | 64GB | 273 GB/s | ~$2,399 |
4. The Mac Studio Lineup (2025)
The Mac Studio was refreshed in March 2025 with M4 Max and M3 Ultra options. This is where serious local AI work happens โ 36GB to 512GB of unified memory with massive bandwidth.
| Configuration | CPU / GPU | Memory | Bandwidth | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Studio M4 Max (base) | 14C CPU / 32C GPU | 36GB | 410 GB/s | $1,999 |
| Mac Studio M4 Max (40-core) | 16C CPU / 40C GPU | 48GB | 546 GB/s | ~$2,499 |
| Mac Studio M4 Max (128GB) | 16C CPU / 40C GPU | 128GB | 546 GB/s | ~$3,499 |
| Mac Studio M3 Ultra (base) | 28C CPU / 60C GPU | 96GB | 819 GB/s | $3,999 |
| Mac Studio M3 Ultra (192GB) | 28C CPU / 60C GPU | 192GB | 819 GB/s | ~$5,199 |
5. What Models Run on Which Machine?
Here's the practical guide โ what you can actually run on each configuration, accounting for OS overhead and KV cache:
| Machine | Usable Memory | Max Model (Q4) | Example Models | Est. Tokens/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Mini M4 16GB | ~12GB | Up to 13B | Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B, Phi-3, Gemma 2 9B | 20โ35 t/s |
| Mac Mini M4 24GB | ~20GB | Up to 20B | Qwen 2.5 14B, CodeLlama 13B, Mistral Small | 15โ25 t/s |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB | ~20GB | Up to 20B | Qwen 2.5 14B, CodeLlama 13B | 30โ45 t/s |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB | ~42GB | Up to 40B | Qwen 2.5 32B, DeepSeek-Coder 33B, Mixtral 8x7B | 15โ25 t/s |
| Mac Studio M4 Max 36GB | ~30GB | Up to 33B | Qwen 2.5 32B, CodeLlama 34B | 18โ28 t/s |
| Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB | ~120GB | Up to 70โ80B | Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B, DeepSeek V2 | 8โ19 t/s |
| Mac Studio M3 Ultra 192GB | ~180GB | Up to 120B+ | Llama 3.1 405B (Q2), any 70B at high quant | 10โ25 t/s |
6. Real-World Benchmarks
These numbers come from community benchmarks running Ollama on actual Apple Silicon hardware:
M4 Max 128GB (MacBook Pro / Mac Studio equivalent)
From Reddit r/ollama benchmarks on a maxed-out M4 Max 128GB:
| Model | Quant | Ollama (GGUF) | LM Studio (MLX) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen 2.5 7B | Q4 | 72.5 t/s | 101.9 t/s |
| Qwen 2.5 14B | Q4 | 38.2 t/s | 52.2 t/s |
| Qwen 2.5 32B | Q4 | 19.4 t/s | 24.5 t/s |
| Qwen 2.5 72B | Q4 | 8.8 t/s | 10.9 t/s |
M4 Pro (Mac Mini)
From Sebastian Raschka's benchmarks, a Mac Mini M4 Pro achieves approximately 45 t/s on a 20B MoE model with mxfp4 precision โ roughly matching NVIDIA's DGX Spark on the same task.
Scaling by Bandwidth
Since inference is bandwidth-bound, you can estimate performance across chips by scaling the M4 Max numbers:
| Chip | Bandwidth | 7B Q4 (est.) | 14B Q4 (est.) | 32B Q4 (est.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M4 (120 GB/s) | 120 | ~25 t/s | ~14 t/s | N/A (won't fit) |
| M4 Pro (273 GB/s) | 273 | ~40 t/s | ~22 t/s | ~12 t/s |
| M4 Max 32C (410 GB/s) | 410 | ~55 t/s | ~29 t/s | ~15 t/s |
| M4 Max 40C (546 GB/s) | 546 | ~72 t/s | ~38 t/s | ~19 t/s |
| M3 Ultra (819 GB/s) | 819 | ~105 t/s | ~57 t/s | ~30 t/s |
7. OpenClaw Task Offloading โ What Can Go Local?
Not every OpenClaw task needs Claude Opus or GPT-4. Here's a practical mapping of tasks to local model requirements:
| OpenClaw Task | Min Model Size | Min Machine | Recommended Model |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heartbeat checks | 7B | Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) | Llama 3.1 8B, Phi-3 |
| Simple cron jobs (summaries) | 7โ13B | Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) | Mistral 7B, Gemma 2 9B |
| News aggregation / parsing | 7โ13B | Mac Mini M4 24GB ($699) | Qwen 2.5 14B |
| Code completion / review | 14โ33B | Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB ($1,399) | DeepSeek-Coder 33B, CodeLlama 34B |
| Research / writing | 32โ70B | Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB ($2,199) | Qwen 2.5 32B, Mixtral 8x7B |
| Complex reasoning | 70B+ | Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB ($3,499) | Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B |
| Embeddings | Any | Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) | nomic-embed-text, all-minilm |
8. Cost Savings Analysis
Typical API Costs
A moderate OpenClaw user running heartbeats, cron jobs, code assistance, and research might spend:
- Light use: $30โ50/month (mostly heartbeats + simple tasks)
- Moderate use: $75โ100/month (code completion + research)
- Heavy use: $150โ300/month (complex reasoning + long context)
What Can You Offload?
Not everything goes local โ Claude and GPT-4 still dominate for complex multi-step reasoning, very long context, and tasks requiring the latest knowledge. But 40โ70% of typical usage can go local:
| Machine | Price | Tasks Offloaded | Monthly Savings | Electricity | Payback Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mac Mini M4 16GB | $499 | Heartbeats, simple cron, embeddings | $15โ25/mo | ~$2/mo | 20โ35 months |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB | $1,399 | + code completion, parsing | $30โ50/mo | ~$3/mo | 28โ47 months |
| Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB | $2,199 | + research, writing, 32B reasoning | $45โ75/mo | ~$3/mo | 29โ49 months |
| Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB | $3,499 | + complex reasoning with 70B | $75โ150/mo | ~$5/mo | 23โ47 months |
Electricity Is Negligible
Apple Silicon is incredibly power-efficient. A Mac Mini draws 5โ7W at idle and 15โ30W under LLM inference load. At $0.15/kWh average US electricity cost:
- Running 24/7 at full load: ~$3.50/month for a Mac Mini
- Running 24/7 at full load: ~$8/month for a Mac Studio
- Compare to an NVIDIA RTX 4090 rig: ~$35โ50/month at full load
9. Setup Guide: Ollama on Mac
Step 1: Install Ollama
# Download from ollama.com or use Homebrew
brew install ollama
# Start the Ollama service
ollama serve
Step 2: Pull Your First Model
# For 16GB Mac โ fast and capable
ollama pull llama3.1:8b
# For 24GB Mac โ great for code
ollama pull qwen2.5:14b
# For 48GB Mac โ strong reasoning
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b
# For 128GB Mac Studio โ frontier-class
ollama pull llama3.1:70b
Step 3: Test It
# Interactive chat
ollama run llama3.1:8b
# API call (compatible with OpenAI format)
curl http://localhost:11434/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "llama3.1:8b",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'
Step 4: Connect to OpenClaw
Ollama exposes an OpenAI-compatible API at http://localhost:11434. You can route OpenClaw tasks to it by configuring your agent to use the local endpoint for specific task types. Alternatively, use OpenRouter as a proxy to dynamically route between local and cloud models.
Performance Tuning Tips
- Close other apps โ every GB of memory freed up is available for larger models or more KV cache
- Use Q4_K_M quantization โ best balance of quality and speed for most models
- Set
OLLAMA_NUM_PARALLEL=1if you want maximum single-request speed - Consider MLX format via LM Studio โ 30โ40% faster than GGUF on Apple Silicon
- Keep models loaded โ set
OLLAMA_KEEP_ALIVE=-1to avoid reload latency
10. Our Recommendations
๐ข Budget: Mac Mini M4 16GB โ $499
Best for: Embeddings, heartbeat checks, simple automation, learning Ollama.
Runs 7โ8B models comfortably. The base M4's 120 GB/s bandwidth means ~25 t/s on Llama 3.1 8B โ fast enough for background tasks but noticeable latency on interactive use. Great as a dedicated AI server alongside your main machine.
๐ต Best Value: Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB โ $1,399
Best for: Code completion, 14B-class models, most OpenClaw offloading.
The 273 GB/s bandwidth is a game-changer โ 2.3ร faster than the base M4. Runs Qwen 2.5 14B at ~30 t/s, which feels fast and responsive. Handles 80% of what you'd want to offload from cloud APIs. This is the sweet spot for most users.
๐ฃ Power User: Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB โ $2,199
Best for: 32B-class reasoning, research tasks, serious local AI work.
Unlocks 32B models like Qwen 2.5 32B and Mixtral 8x7B. Quality jumps significantly from 14B to 32B for writing and reasoning tasks. If you're replacing a significant portion of your Claude usage, this is where the output quality starts to compete.
๐ก No Compromise: Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB โ $3,499
Best for: Running 70B models, near-Claude quality on local hardware.
Llama 3.1 70B at ~9 t/s is slow but usable for batch/background tasks. Qwen 2.5 72B with Q4 quantization provides surprisingly good reasoning. The 546 GB/s bandwidth means 7B models fly at 70+ t/s. This is the ultimate "run anything" machine.
References
- Apple Mac Mini Technical Specifications โ apple.com
- Apple Mac Studio Technical Specifications โ apple.com
- Ollama โ Run LLMs Locally โ ollama.com
- Performance of llama.cpp on Apple Silicon M-series โ GitHub Discussion (ggerganov)
- Tested local LLMs on a maxed out M4 MacBook Pro โ Reddit r/ollama
- DGX Spark and Mac Mini for Local PyTorch Development โ Sebastian Raschka
- Apple M4 โ Wikipedia โ memory bandwidth specifications
- Benchmarking local Ollama LLMs on Apple M4 Pro vs RTX 3060 โ Dmitry Markov, LinkedIn
- Inference Speed Tests โ Community Benchmark Repo โ GitHub
- The Complete Guide to Running LLMs Locally โ iKangai
๐ฌ Discussion
Have questions about running Ollama on your Mac? Found different benchmark numbers? Share your experience in the comments โ we'd love to hear what models and configs you're running.