๐ŸŽง Listen
๐Ÿ“บ Watch the Video Watch the full video breakdown at thinksmart.life/youtube.

1. Why Run LLMs Locally?

Cloud APIs are powerful but expensive. If you use OpenClaw, Claude, or GPT-4 heavily, your monthly bill can easily hit $50โ€“200+. Every heartbeat check, cron job, code completion, and research task burns tokens at Anthropic or OpenAI rates.

Running local models via Ollama on Apple Silicon lets you offload many of these tasks to hardware you own โ€” with zero marginal cost per token, complete privacy, and no rate limits.

Apple Silicon is uniquely suited for this because of its unified memory architecture โ€” the CPU and GPU share the same memory pool. This means a Mac Mini with 24GB of unified memory can use all 24GB for model weights, unlike a PC where your GPU's VRAM is separate from system RAM.

๐Ÿ’ก The Key Insight For LLM inference, memory bandwidth matters more than raw compute. Apple Silicon's high-bandwidth unified memory makes it surprisingly competitive with discrete GPUs costing 2โ€“3ร— more.

2. Why Memory Matters for LLMs

Unified Memory = Your Entire Pool Is Available

On a traditional PC, your RTX 4090 has 24GB of VRAM. If a model doesn't fit, it spills to system RAM over the PCIe bus โ€” and performance collapses 10โ€“20ร—. On Apple Silicon, there's no bus to cross. The GPU cores read directly from the same memory pool as the CPU.

Memory Bandwidth = Tokens Per Second

LLM inference during text generation is memory-bandwidth bound, not compute-bound. Every token generated requires reading the entire model's weights from memory. The formula is simple:

๐Ÿ”ข Tokens/sec โ‰ˆ Memory Bandwidth รท Model Size (in bytes) A 7B Q4 model โ‰ˆ 4GB. On a Mac Mini M4 with 120 GB/s bandwidth: ~30 tokens/sec theoretical maximum. Real-world overhead brings this to ~25โ€“35 t/s depending on the model.

How Much Memory Do Models Need?

A rough rule of thumb for 4-bit quantized (Q4) models:

Memory Bandwidth Comparison

Chip Bandwidth vs RTX 4090 (1,008 GB/s)
M4120 GB/s12%
M4 Pro273 GB/s27%
M4 Max (32-core GPU)410 GB/s41%
M4 Max (40-core GPU)546 GB/s54%
M3 Ultra819 GB/s81%

While Apple Silicon can't match an RTX 4090's raw bandwidth, remember: the 4090 only has 24GB of VRAM. A Mac Studio with 128GB can run models the 4090 simply cannot fit.

3. The Mac Mini M4 Lineup (2024)

The Mac Mini was redesigned in late 2024 โ€” it's now roughly the size of an Apple TV, starting at just $499. Here's every configuration relevant for local AI:

Configuration CPU / GPU Memory Bandwidth Price
Mac Mini M4 (base) 10C CPU / 10C GPU 16GB 120 GB/s $499
Mac Mini M4 (upgraded RAM) 10C CPU / 10C GPU 24GB 120 GB/s $699
Mac Mini M4 (max RAM) 10C CPU / 10C GPU 32GB 120 GB/s $899
Mac Mini M4 Pro (base) 12C CPU / 16C GPU 24GB 273 GB/s $1,399
Mac Mini M4 Pro (48GB) 14C CPU / 20C GPU 48GB 273 GB/s ~$2,199
Mac Mini M4 Pro (64GB) 14C CPU / 20C GPU 64GB 273 GB/s ~$2,399
โš ๏ธ The M4 vs M4 Pro bandwidth gap is huge The base M4 at 120 GB/s will generate tokens ~2.3ร— slower than the M4 Pro at 273 GB/s, even with the same model. If speed matters, the M4 Pro is the minimum for a good experience.

4. The Mac Studio Lineup (2025)

The Mac Studio was refreshed in March 2025 with M4 Max and M3 Ultra options. This is where serious local AI work happens โ€” 36GB to 512GB of unified memory with massive bandwidth.

Configuration CPU / GPU Memory Bandwidth Price
Mac Studio M4 Max (base) 14C CPU / 32C GPU 36GB 410 GB/s $1,999
Mac Studio M4 Max (40-core) 16C CPU / 40C GPU 48GB 546 GB/s ~$2,499
Mac Studio M4 Max (128GB) 16C CPU / 40C GPU 128GB 546 GB/s ~$3,499
Mac Studio M3 Ultra (base) 28C CPU / 60C GPU 96GB 819 GB/s $3,999
Mac Studio M3 Ultra (192GB) 28C CPU / 60C GPU 192GB 819 GB/s ~$5,199
๐Ÿ’ก Note on M4 Ultra As of February 2026, the Mac Studio with M4 Ultra hasn't shipped yet. The M3 Ultra remains the current option for 192GB+ configurations. When M4 Ultra arrives, expect ~1,092 GB/s bandwidth and up to 256GB unified memory โ€” making it the ultimate local LLM machine.

5. What Models Run on Which Machine?

Here's the practical guide โ€” what you can actually run on each configuration, accounting for OS overhead and KV cache:

Machine Usable Memory Max Model (Q4) Example Models Est. Tokens/s
Mac Mini M4 16GB ~12GB Up to 13B Llama 3.1 8B, Mistral 7B, Phi-3, Gemma 2 9B 20โ€“35 t/s
Mac Mini M4 24GB ~20GB Up to 20B Qwen 2.5 14B, CodeLlama 13B, Mistral Small 15โ€“25 t/s
Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB ~20GB Up to 20B Qwen 2.5 14B, CodeLlama 13B 30โ€“45 t/s
Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB ~42GB Up to 40B Qwen 2.5 32B, DeepSeek-Coder 33B, Mixtral 8x7B 15โ€“25 t/s
Mac Studio M4 Max 36GB ~30GB Up to 33B Qwen 2.5 32B, CodeLlama 34B 18โ€“28 t/s
Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB ~120GB Up to 70โ€“80B Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B, DeepSeek V2 8โ€“19 t/s
Mac Studio M3 Ultra 192GB ~180GB Up to 120B+ Llama 3.1 405B (Q2), any 70B at high quant 10โ€“25 t/s

6. Real-World Benchmarks

These numbers come from community benchmarks running Ollama on actual Apple Silicon hardware:

M4 Max 128GB (MacBook Pro / Mac Studio equivalent)

From Reddit r/ollama benchmarks on a maxed-out M4 Max 128GB:

Model Quant Ollama (GGUF) LM Studio (MLX)
Qwen 2.5 7BQ472.5 t/s101.9 t/s
Qwen 2.5 14BQ438.2 t/s52.2 t/s
Qwen 2.5 32BQ419.4 t/s24.5 t/s
Qwen 2.5 72BQ48.8 t/s10.9 t/s

M4 Pro (Mac Mini)

From Sebastian Raschka's benchmarks, a Mac Mini M4 Pro achieves approximately 45 t/s on a 20B MoE model with mxfp4 precision โ€” roughly matching NVIDIA's DGX Spark on the same task.

Scaling by Bandwidth

Since inference is bandwidth-bound, you can estimate performance across chips by scaling the M4 Max numbers:

Chip Bandwidth 7B Q4 (est.) 14B Q4 (est.) 32B Q4 (est.)
M4 (120 GB/s)120~25 t/s~14 t/sN/A (won't fit)
M4 Pro (273 GB/s)273~40 t/s~22 t/s~12 t/s
M4 Max 32C (410 GB/s)410~55 t/s~29 t/s~15 t/s
M4 Max 40C (546 GB/s)546~72 t/s~38 t/s~19 t/s
M3 Ultra (819 GB/s)819~105 t/s~57 t/s~30 t/s

7. OpenClaw Task Offloading โ€” What Can Go Local?

Not every OpenClaw task needs Claude Opus or GPT-4. Here's a practical mapping of tasks to local model requirements:

OpenClaw Task Min Model Size Min Machine Recommended Model
Heartbeat checks 7B Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) Llama 3.1 8B, Phi-3
Simple cron jobs (summaries) 7โ€“13B Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) Mistral 7B, Gemma 2 9B
News aggregation / parsing 7โ€“13B Mac Mini M4 24GB ($699) Qwen 2.5 14B
Code completion / review 14โ€“33B Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB ($1,399) DeepSeek-Coder 33B, CodeLlama 34B
Research / writing 32โ€“70B Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB ($2,199) Qwen 2.5 32B, Mixtral 8x7B
Complex reasoning 70B+ Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB ($3,499) Llama 3.1 70B, Qwen 2.5 72B
Embeddings Any Mac Mini M4 16GB ($499) nomic-embed-text, all-minilm
๐ŸŽฏ The Sweet Spot For most OpenClaw users, the Mac Mini M4 Pro with 24GB ($1,399) handles 70โ€“80% of offloadable tasks. It runs 7โ€“14B models comfortably at 30โ€“45 t/s and handles code completion with ease. Step up to 48GB ($2,199) if you want 32B-class reasoning.

8. Cost Savings Analysis

Typical API Costs

A moderate OpenClaw user running heartbeats, cron jobs, code assistance, and research might spend:

What Can You Offload?

Not everything goes local โ€” Claude and GPT-4 still dominate for complex multi-step reasoning, very long context, and tasks requiring the latest knowledge. But 40โ€“70% of typical usage can go local:

Machine Price Tasks Offloaded Monthly Savings Electricity Payback Period
Mac Mini M4 16GB $499 Heartbeats, simple cron, embeddings $15โ€“25/mo ~$2/mo 20โ€“35 months
Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB $1,399 + code completion, parsing $30โ€“50/mo ~$3/mo 28โ€“47 months
Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB $2,199 + research, writing, 32B reasoning $45โ€“75/mo ~$3/mo 29โ€“49 months
Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB $3,499 + complex reasoning with 70B $75โ€“150/mo ~$5/mo 23โ€“47 months

Electricity Is Negligible

Apple Silicon is incredibly power-efficient. A Mac Mini draws 5โ€“7W at idle and 15โ€“30W under LLM inference load. At $0.15/kWh average US electricity cost:

โš ๏ธ Honest Take on ROI Pure cost savings alone rarely justify the purchase โ€” payback periods of 2โ€“4 years assume consistent usage. The real value is in zero-cost experimentation, privacy, no rate limits, and having local AI available even when APIs are down. Think of it as infrastructure, not just a cost offset.

9. Setup Guide: Ollama on Mac

Step 1: Install Ollama

# Download from ollama.com or use Homebrew
brew install ollama

# Start the Ollama service
ollama serve

Step 2: Pull Your First Model

# For 16GB Mac โ€” fast and capable
ollama pull llama3.1:8b

# For 24GB Mac โ€” great for code
ollama pull qwen2.5:14b

# For 48GB Mac โ€” strong reasoning
ollama pull qwen2.5:32b

# For 128GB Mac Studio โ€” frontier-class
ollama pull llama3.1:70b

Step 3: Test It

# Interactive chat
ollama run llama3.1:8b

# API call (compatible with OpenAI format)
curl http://localhost:11434/v1/chat/completions \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "llama3.1:8b",
    "messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
  }'

Step 4: Connect to OpenClaw

Ollama exposes an OpenAI-compatible API at http://localhost:11434. You can route OpenClaw tasks to it by configuring your agent to use the local endpoint for specific task types. Alternatively, use OpenRouter as a proxy to dynamically route between local and cloud models.

Performance Tuning Tips

10. Our Recommendations

๐ŸŸข Budget: Mac Mini M4 16GB โ€” $499

Best for: Embeddings, heartbeat checks, simple automation, learning Ollama.

Runs 7โ€“8B models comfortably. The base M4's 120 GB/s bandwidth means ~25 t/s on Llama 3.1 8B โ€” fast enough for background tasks but noticeable latency on interactive use. Great as a dedicated AI server alongside your main machine.

๐Ÿ”ต Best Value: Mac Mini M4 Pro 24GB โ€” $1,399

Best for: Code completion, 14B-class models, most OpenClaw offloading.

The 273 GB/s bandwidth is a game-changer โ€” 2.3ร— faster than the base M4. Runs Qwen 2.5 14B at ~30 t/s, which feels fast and responsive. Handles 80% of what you'd want to offload from cloud APIs. This is the sweet spot for most users.

๐ŸŸฃ Power User: Mac Mini M4 Pro 48GB โ€” $2,199

Best for: 32B-class reasoning, research tasks, serious local AI work.

Unlocks 32B models like Qwen 2.5 32B and Mixtral 8x7B. Quality jumps significantly from 14B to 32B for writing and reasoning tasks. If you're replacing a significant portion of your Claude usage, this is where the output quality starts to compete.

๐ŸŸก No Compromise: Mac Studio M4 Max 128GB โ€” $3,499

Best for: Running 70B models, near-Claude quality on local hardware.

Llama 3.1 70B at ~9 t/s is slow but usable for batch/background tasks. Qwen 2.5 72B with Q4 quantization provides surprisingly good reasoning. The 546 GB/s bandwidth means 7B models fly at 70+ t/s. This is the ultimate "run anything" machine.

๐Ÿค” Wait for M4 Ultra? If you need 70B+ models at interactive speeds, the M4 Ultra (expected mid-2026) with ~1,092 GB/s bandwidth and up to 256GB memory will be the play. It should push 70B Q4 to ~18โ€“22 t/s โ€” genuinely fast. For now, the M4 Max 128GB is the practical ceiling.

References

๐Ÿ’ฌ Discussion

Have questions about running Ollama on your Mac? Found different benchmark numbers? Share your experience in the comments โ€” we'd love to hear what models and configs you're running.